Seat A main · turn 563
advisor (reviewing)
H23 item 81: PASSING BACK A WRITTEN PLAN ONLY, no execution -- this session already ran a full context compaction plus a complete turn (560, T9 flangeHeight) since I myself flagged this item as needing a rested seat (turn 550). Plan on branch t10-item81-plan (pushed, origin/main @ 6d277f6): restates the measured symptom (top_edge's curvature drifts p02_04-p02_11, endpoints stay pinned), what's ruled out, a phase-by-phase incremental-measurement methodology to isolate the exact step, and an explicit reminder that ANY T10 phase-file fix needs the same go-ahead turn 552 required before it ships (re-recording goldens exposes this same drift). No matrix/shots yet -- nothing to matrix without a declared fix. Recommending Fred start a fresh seat A per your own offer; Fusion holder untouched (confirmed none).
updated 2026-10-05T01:14:16Z
+54 more, swipe in the viewerSeat B ↗ lane-b · turn 342
advisor (reviewing)
16(c) investigated, pushed as a WRITTEN PLAN not code (8326c9f) -- per your own explicit permission. T18's own self-intersection is NOT the two-primitives-facing case buildNotchJoint already handles: it's a single large arc (r=2.633) overshooting past an adjacent, UNDROPPED line primitive near their shared joint when offset inward -- a genuinely different geometric mechanism, confirmed precisely (exact primitives identified, exact crossing location). T9 at 9x12 did NOT reproduce any self-intersection at 0.75/1/1.25in -- flagging that your own 'T9 waist at 1in+' reference may be a different board size/context than what I tried. Recommended next step in WORK-LOG: a general per-joint crossing detector (checks if ANY two flanking offset curves actually cross, not just a pre-classified facing-pattern) with true intersection-point truncation -- generalizes to both mechanisms without needing to tell them apart upfront. This exhausts my own queue for this turn. 16(b)/13/18/10 remain per your ordering. Given this has been a very long session, I'll hold here rather than start something new -- let me know if you want me to continue or if a fresh seat should pick up from here.
updated 2026-10-04T23:30:21Z
+54 more, swipe in the viewerSeat C ↗ fb-app · turn 255
worker (working)
Slice 3 received (bb9e664), review under way; it merges once 88 updates the matrix probes to the new contract (no Bricks layer on a fresh board), nothing for you there; the 1.25 default (f4c6208) is in the gate now. NEXT, in order. (1) F26 item 2 (b): the Delete frame button beside Send frame (same row, secondary style). App: the frame goes back to none (template None, artwork untouched, ONE undo step). Fusion mode: it also deletes the bodies/components that Send frame created, found exactly the way Send frame already finds them when it replaces the previous frame; nothing else touched; no confirm dialog. Tests: JS + the Python delete path. Fusion live-check: take the holder (~/.bspline-status/fusion_holder.txt = 37; it reads none now; write none back when done), deploy only from your fb-app worktree with origin/main merged (2086bd1 is), then stop/run the add-in and deleteMe the palette so you test the new JS; shots web + Fusion to shots/seat37; the DEPLOY script logs the deploy itself. Commit as F26 item 2: ... (2) F35 item 13: the new wall patterns from Fred sheet (rotation, stacked horizontal, chevron, basketweave single and double, boxed) as declared BRICK_PATTERNS entries in core/bricks/layouts/, closed-form, same fill/clip/texture pipeline, engine-drawn icons in the Wall grid. 88 edits library.js on band-fit (MIN_PIECE_FRACTION): merge origin/main first and keep your library.js change to the registration lines. A preview sheet of every new pattern on a 7x9 wall to shots/seat37; matrix rows, one per pattern (canvas + 3D change). Item 35 (bands reduced note) comes by amend when band-fit lands.
updated 2026-10-05T13:04:37Z
+54 more, swipe in the viewer